COMPARATIVE-TYPOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CERAMICS OF THE EARLY IRON AGE CULTURES IN THE KAMA REGION AND THE CIS-URALS (THE ISSUE OF THEIR GENETIC CONTINUITY)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24852/2587-6112.2021.2.207.220Keywords:
archaeology, Ananyino, Pianyi Bor, Kara-Abyz, Gliadenovo cultures, ceramics, comparative statistical analysis, statistical sampling, typological similarity coeffi cientAbstract
The author publishes the results of a comparative statistical analysis of ceramics from the hillforts of the Early Iron Age cultures of the Kama region and the Cis-Urals – Ananyino, Pianyi Bor, Kara-Abyz and Gliadenovo. The main task resolved by the author is to establish the degree of genetic kinship of the aforesaid cultures (on the example of their ceramics), and most importantly, to clarify the role of the Ananyino Corded Ware culture (ACWC) in the composition of these cultures. The author provides data on the combined characteristics of the compared ceramic complexes (random statistical samples) and the results of calculating the degree of their typological similarity. The general conclusion is that there are more typological differences between the compared groups of vessels than there are similarities.
References
Ashikhmina, L. I. 2014. Genezis anan’inskoi kul’tury v Srednem Prikam’e (po materialam keramiki i zhilishch) (Genesis of the Ananyino Culture in the Middle Kama Area (According to the Ceramics and Dwellings)). Series: Arkheologiia evraziiskikh stepei (Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes) 19. Kazan:
Institute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Khalikov, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences; “Otechestvo” Publ. (in Russian).
Vorobeva, S. L. 2018. Ufi mskii arkheologicheskii vestnik (Ufa Archaeological Herald) (18), 75−85 (in Russian).
Gening, V. F. 1973. In Sovetskaya arkheologiya (Soviet archeology). (1). 114–136 (in Russian).
Gening, V. F., Buniatian, E. P., Pustovalov, S. Zh., Rychkov, N. A. 1990. Formalizovanno-statisticheskie metody v arkheologii (analiz pogrebal'nykh pamiatnikov) (Formalized Statistical Methods in Archaeology (Analysis of Burial Sites)). Kiev: “Naukova dumka” Publ. (in Russian).
Goldina, R. D. 2004. Tarasovskii mogil’nik I–V vv. na Srednei Kame (Tarasovo Burial Ground of the 1st – 5th centuries on the Middle Kama). Vol. 1. Izhevsk: “Udmurtiia” Publ. (in Russian).
Zubov, S. E. 2007. Ufi mskii arkheologicheskii vestnik (Ufa Archaeological Herald) (6–7), 72–88 (in Russian).
Ivanov, V. A. 2017. In Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh stepei (Archaeology of Eurasian Steppes) 3, 175–182 (in Russian).
Ivanov, V. A. 1983. In Sovetskaya arkheologiya (Soviet archeology). (3). 199−210 (in Russian).
Ivanov, V. A. 2003. In Yaminov, A. F. (ed.). Ufi mskii arkheologicheskii vestnik (Ufa Archaeological Herald) 4. Ufa: “Gilem” Publ., 199–215 (in Russian).
Ivanov, V. A. 2009. In Kuzminykh, S. V., Chizhevsky, A. A. (eds.). U istokov arkheologii Volgo-Kam’ia (k 150-letiiu otkrytiia Anan’inskogo mogil’nika) (At the Origins of Archaeology of the Volga-Kama Region (on the 150th Anniversary of Discovery of the Ananyino Burial Ground)). Series: Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes 8. Yelabuga: Institute of History named after Sh. Mardzhani, Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, 56−63 (in Russian).
Ivanov, V. A. 2017. In Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh stepei (Archaeology of Eurasian Steppes) 3, 175–182 (in Russian).
Ivanov, V. A. 2020. In Botalov, G. S. (ed.). Etnicheskie vzaimodeistviia na Iuzhnom Urale: materialy VI Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii (g. Cheliabinsk, 1 oktiabria – 30 noiabria 2020 g.) (Ethnic Interactions in the Southern Urals: Materials of the 6th All-Russian Scientifi c Conference (Chelyabinsk, October 1st - November 30th, 2020)). Cheliabinsk: Cheliabinsk Museum of Local Lore, 292−298 (in Russian).
Ivanov, V. A. 2017. In Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh stepei (Archaeology of Eurasian Steppes) 3, 175–182 (in Russian).
Koreniuk, S. N., Mel'nichuk, A. F., Pereskokov, M. L. 2014. In Kuzminykh, S. V., Chizhevsky, A. A. (eds.). Anan’inskii mir: istoki, razvitie, sviazi, istoricheskie sud’by (The World of Ananyino: Origins, Evolution, Relations, Historical Fate). Series: Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh stepei (Archaeology of Eurasian Steppes) 20. Kazan: “Otechestvo” Publ., 116–131 (in Russian).
Krasnopeоrov, A. A. 2010. In Ufi mskii arkheologicheskii vestnik (Ufa Archaeological Herald) (10), 83−109 (in Russian).
Fedorov-Davydov, G. A. 1987. Statisticheskie metody v arkheologii: Uchebnoe posobie dlia vuzov po spets. «Istoriia» (Statistical Methods in Archaeology: Study Guide for Universities with Specialization in History). Moscow: “Vysshaia shkola” Publ. (in Russian).
Chernykh, E. M. 2004. In Ivanova, M. G. (ed.). Udmurtskoi arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii – 50 let (50th Anniversary of Udmurt Archaeological Expedition) Izhevsk: Udmurt Institute of History, Language and Literature, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 113–131 (in Russian).
Chernykh, E. M. 2012. In Lipina, L. I., Shirobokova, N. F. (eds.). Drevnosti Prikam’ia epokhi zheleza: khronologicheskaia atributsiia (Iron Age Antiquities of the Kama Area: Chronological Attribution). Series: Materialy i issledovaniia Kamsko-Viatskoi arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii (Proceedings and Research of the Kama-Vyatka Archaeological Expedition) 25. Izhevsk: Udmurt State University, 113–123 (in Russian).
Shmuratko, D. V. 2012. Kurgannye mogil'niki kharinskogo tipa v Verkhnem Prikam'e v kontekste kul'turno-istoricheskikh protsessov epokhi Velikogo pereseleniia narodov (statisticheskii analiz pogrebal'nykh kompleksov) (Barrow Burial Mounds of the Kharino Type in the Upper Kama Region in the Context of Cultural and Historical Processes of the Great Migration Period (Statistical Analysis of Funerary Complexes)). PhD Thesis. Kazan (in Russian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 V. A. Ivanov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
